Skip to content

Breaking down the World Series matchup

Oct 27, 2015, 1:00 PM EDT


The 111th World Series features a historic matchup: Did you know this is the first time two expansion franchises have met in the Fall Classic? That’s right, each of the previous 110 series included at least one of baseball’s original 16 franchises. Pretty remarkable, huh?

Not that the Mets and Royals don’t have plenty of their own history, of course. New York owns two titles (1969, 1986) and two other World Series appearances (1973, 2000). Kansas City owns only one title (1985) to go with two other appearances (1980, 2014). Either way, the winner of this series is going to end a championship drought of at least 29 years.

How do the two teams stack up? And who do we think will prevail? Nationals Insider Mark Zuckerman offers five points in favor of the Mets, while Orioles Insider Rich Dubroff gives five reasons to pick the Royals. Enjoy…


1. The best rotation in baseball
With all due respect to the Nationals and everyone who gushed over their rotation heading into Opening Day — yes, including yours truly — the Mets actually have baseball’s best group of starters. How good? You can make a legitimate case for any one of three young right-handers to start Game 1 of the World Series, with Matt Harvey, Jacob deGrom and Noah Syndergaard a collective 6-1 with a 2.36 ERA and 63 strikeouts in 45 2/3 innings pitched so far this postseason. Harvey gets the ball for the opener, but those three young aces are positioned to start six of a possible seven games in the series. And it’s not like Game 4 starter Steven Matz is any slouch. These guys are the real deal, and the fact they can consistently provide six or seven innings per start (unlike the Royals’ erratic rotation) means Terry Collins doesn’t have to worry about going to his bullpen too early.

2. An explosive lineup
Has one team’s lineup ever been so completely transformed in-season like this one? On July 31, the Mets ranked last in the majors in runs scored. Yes, last. From that point on, they ranked second (behind only the crazy-explosive Blue Jays). The addition of Yoenis Cespedes obviously made a huge difference, but it’s not all on him. David Wright returned from a long DL stint. Michael Conforto was called up from Class AA and became an immediate contributor. Travis d’Arnaud continued to develop. Curtis Granderson was an experienced force at the top of the lineup. And then Daniel Murphy … well, he turned into Babe Ruth. Put that all together, and you’ve got a lineup that can out-slug anybody right now.

3. A veteran-laden bench
Just as important as the Cespedes acquisition were the additions of Juan Uribe and Kelly Johnson to the Mets roster. They’ve since been bumped from the lineup, but they’re both experienced and dangerous bats for Collins to summon when he needs something off the bench. (Johnson serves as DH in Game 1, hardly a disadvantage for the AL club.) New York also has Michael Cuddyer, a true professional hitter. Late in a tight ballgame, you can just about guarantee the Mets will send a productive batters to the plate with a good chance to deliver.

4. Jeurys Familia is near-perfect and can go multiple innings
The Royals’ bullpen gets all the love, but how about the job the Mets’ closer has done this month? Familia’s total pitching line through the NLDS and NLCS: 9.2 IP, 2 H, 0 R, 2 BB, 6 K. Opponents are batting a pathetic .065 against him. Right-handed batters are 0-for-12. With an upper-90s fastball and a forkball that dives down in the zone, Familia is able to induce nothing but groundballs and weak contact. And he has already shown the ability to record more than three outs, doing that three times in eight total appearances so far. No, the Mets’ setup men don’t compare to the Royals’ setup men. But the dominant rotation and dominant Familia afford Collins the luxury of not needing very much bridge work.

5. The magic factor
Let’s be honest here: The Mets have had something special going on for three months now. Nobody — and I mean NOBODY — thought they’d make the postseason, let alone, the World Series in late July. They looked like a trainwreck, especially after their proposed Carlos Gomez trade fell through. Since then, just about every possible thing that could go their way has gone their way. And that has continued through the playoffs. Call it intangibles, call it confidence, call it destiny. Whatever you want to call it, the Mets have it.

Why Mark likes New York to win the World Series
There’s only one thing that leaves me leery about picking the Mets: The long layoff they just sat through. They had five full days off between the NLCS and World Series, and if you don’t think that can be a problem, you haven’t been paying in recent years. The last four teams that swept their LCS (and thus subsequently had a long layoff) went on to lose the World Series, three of them in five games or fewer. That’s troubling, because all that momentum and magic the Mets built up could have disappeared in the last week. That said, the Royals just had three days off themselves, so it’s not like they haven’t had a chance to cool off in the interim. And ultimately, I just can’t get past New York’s trio of aces and deep lineup and bench. This isn’t a perfect team, but they’ve played just about perfectly for months now. I was a skeptic throughout, but no more. Mets win in 6.


1. The Royals’ hitters are much more experienced than the Cubs
Chicago featured a lineup of powerful, young players who had difficulty adjusting to the Mets. While Kris Bryant, Anthony Rizzo and Kyle Schwarber are terrific, they’re still inexperienced. The Royals have an experienced lineup with players that have lots of postseason experience. Six of their nine regulars (Lorenzo Cain, Alcides Escobar, Alex Gordon, Eric Hosmer, Mike Moustakas and Salvador Perez) came within an eyelash of winning the World Series a year ago. Two of the three regular additions (Kendrys Morales and Ben Zobrist) have plenty of postseason experience, and the third (Alex Rios) played in more regular-season games without reaching the postseason than anyone.

2. These guys can score in a hurry
Twice in this year’s playoffs, the Royals have scored five runs in an inning to turn a loss into a win. Kansas City was six outs from elimination in the eighth inning of Game 4 of the ALDS against Houston. The Royals began the inning with five straight singles and turned a 6-2 deficit into a 7-6 lead. In the Game 2 of the ALCS, Kansas City scored five in the eighth on six hits — five singles and a double — and after falling behind 3-0, they led 5-3. The Orioles saw this quick work, too. On Aug. 24, they led the Royals 3-1 after 5 1/2 innings. Kansas City scored seven runs on eight hits, dizzying the Orioles. No team in baseball has this combination of speed (their 104 stolen bases were second in the majors) and terrific fundamentals. Cain’s dash home from first base with none out on a single was the play of the postseason.

3. Kansas City’s starters may not be as good as New York’s, but they’re still plenty good
Anyone would rather have Jacob deGrom, Matt Harvey, Steven Matz and Noah Syndergaard’s future than the Royals’ four, but Johnny Cueto, Yordano Ventura, Edinson Volquez and Chris Young are good enough to keep Kansas City in any game. Sure, Cueto has struggled since coming over to the American League, and has been fragile in opposing parks in the postseason, but current Mets batters are hitting just .205 against him, and the ultra-hot Daniel Murphy is 3-for-17 with no homers off Cueto.

4. Daniel Murphy can’t stay this hot, and the Mets may get cold
No one can hit home runs in seven straight postseason games. Until Murphy came along not a single Met in the team’s 54 seasons had hit a home run in six straight games. The Mets will have been off five days since eliminating the Cubs, and that can’t help. Only once in the Division Series era, which began back in 1995 has a team which won the LCS in four straight games won the Series. That was in the first year of the Division Series when the Atlanta Braves beat the Cleveland Indians.

5. The Royals bullpen is superb
Greg Holland went down in September, and Wade Davis took over as closer. What were Davis’ numbers this season? He was 8-1 with an 0.94 ERA. Davis averages an astonishing 4.4 hits per nine innings. Ryan Madson, who was saved from the scrap heap this season, took Davis’ place as a setup man. He was 1-2 with a 2.13 ERA and struck out more than four times as many as he walked. Kelvin Herrera is an effective bridge, and among these three, none are prone to giving up home runs. Danny Duffy, the Royals’ fifth starter, can be a long man, if necessary.

Why Rich likes Kansas City to win the World Series
The Royals and Mets have played just nine games against each other, but will play each other at Kauffman Stadium to begin the 2016 season. That’s never happened before. Every year, National League partisans claim that the American League team will be at a disadvantage in the World Series because they lose the designated hitter. Let’s put that argument to bed. In the 20 World Series since the Division Series began, the AL and NL have each won 10. In 2013, John Farrell found a way to use David Ortiz in St. Louis, and this year, Ned Yost can find a way to use Morales at Citi Field, too. Kansas City’s lineup is far better than New York’s, and its pitching, which had some issues with Toronto, will shut down the Mets’ hitters. A deep lineup, good starting pitching and outstanding bullpen give this one to the Royals in five.

  1. sjberke - Oct 27, 2015 at 2:35 PM

    Of course, when Mark cites ‘the original 16 franchises’, he is talking about the 16 that were in existence when the first National League/American League World Series was played in 1903. Professional baseball had been around quite a while at that point; if we start from the founding of the National League in 1876, only two current franchises survive from that point, the team that is now the Cubs and the team that is now the Braves.

  2. jd - Oct 27, 2015 at 3:40 PM

    Rooting for the Royals (more accurately against the Mets) but I think the Mets starting pitching might be too much for the Royals.

    • natsfan1a - Oct 27, 2015 at 7:35 PM

      No predictions here but I’m also rooting for Royals/against Mets. Over the years of my Nats fandom, I have been given ample opportunity (ahem) to root for division rivals in the postseason, should I be so inclined. Turns out, I’m not wired that way. Cannot flip that switch when autumn leaves start to fall. Not for Philly, or Atlanta, or New York. (And probably not for Miami either, but I don’t really need to have a real life scenario to test that, Marlins. Thank you in advance for your kind cooperation.) Oh, and go, Royals.

  3. Eugene in Oregon - Oct 27, 2015 at 3:53 PM

    I’m not rooting against the Mets — they put together a good team, made some smart moves, and weren’t obnoxious about it (in my view) — but I expect the Royals to take the series in six or seven games.

  4. jd - Oct 27, 2015 at 4:11 PM


    You are right with your comments but I’m just a sore lose and I feel like the Mets are eating our lunch.

    • npb99 - Oct 27, 2015 at 4:44 PM

      +1. Exactly my sentiment as well.

  5. Section 222 - Oct 27, 2015 at 4:17 PM

    I’m going with the Royals in 6 too. I don’t think the Mets’ magic can last and the Royals are very hungry to finish the job after coming so close last year.

    As for who I’m rooting for, I’m not really sure. I’ll figure that out when the games start and might even change my mind as the series goes along, like I did in the Mets-Dodgers series. That’s one of the fun things about watching the playoffs with no particular allegiance to either team.

    • jd - Oct 27, 2015 at 4:28 PM

      I don’t know. Harvey against Volquez – advantage Mets
      DeGrom against Cueto – advantage Mets
      Sybdergaard against Ventura – advantage Mets
      Matz against Young – even

      I know the Royals are tough to strike out and I know that once you get to the 7th inning and the Royals have the lead they are tough to beat but that’s quite a massive starting pitching advantage to the Mets. no?

      • Section 222 - Oct 27, 2015 at 5:15 PM

        Not as big as you suggest, no. Both Cueto and Ventura have the ability to turn in gems. And Volquez already has one in the playoffs as well. I agree that all three games on paper are advantage Mets in starting pitching, but the Royals have won games started by Price and Keuchel who are the equal of any of the Mets pitchers. More important, the Mets haven’t faced a lot of adversity in the playoffs yet. In the games they’ve won, they were behind only once — by one run in Game 5 of the NLDS. And the Royals’ bullpen is a whole lot better than the Dodgers’ or the Cubs’. And you can bet that Yost will use it even if they aren’t ahead. That’s the beauty of the off days. Basically, he can use all his bullets in every game, sometimes for multiple innings, if he needs to.

        The Royals, on the other hand, have come back from big deficits. They seem to specialize in stringing singles together, keeping the line moving. They work ABs and don’t beat themselves with baserunning or fielding errors. Familia is excellent, but the rest of the Mets’ relievers can be touched up. Niese and Colon could be secret weapons but neither is a lights out pitcher like Herrara.

        That’s the way I see it anyone, on the eve of Game 1.

  6. Mrsb loves the Nats - Oct 27, 2015 at 4:18 PM

    L Cain is 1 of my favy OF… along with T Hunter (and yeah I was a HUGE K Griffey J fan)… so hoping that he can carry the Royals on to victory…

  7. jd - Oct 27, 2015 at 4:29 PM

    The pitching coach for the Royals (Eiland) was asked how his team intends to pitch to Murphy. His answer: ‘He stands close to the plate. I’ll leave it at that’.


    • Mrsb loves the Nats - Oct 27, 2015 at 4:56 PM

      I don’t understand why more pitchers weren’t pitching him inside. Make him back up off the plate. Get his feet moving… ‘Jam him’ as Bob says…

      Meh, he has been scorching lately. So we will see if it works.

      • jd - Oct 27, 2015 at 5:13 PM

        It always works. He is just too comfortable. For some reason pitching inside has almost completely gone out of baseball. None of our pitchers try to own the inside corner and it’s a pity. I followed Pedro Martinez very closely and this was one of the main reasons for his success. No one ever dared to get too comfortable with him because you never knew when he’ll come in way inside on you.

      • Section 222 - Oct 27, 2015 at 5:16 PM

        Don’t forget several of Murphy’s HRs have been on pitches down and in. I don’t disagree with trying to back him off the plate, but if the ball is down and he anticipates and gets around on it, he can swat it into the seats.

      • jd - Oct 27, 2015 at 5:22 PM


        I am talking about pitching way in so the hitter has to skip away from the pitch, it’s not meant to be an out pitch or to hit the batter but it normally causes the hitter to get ‘happy feet’ . Once in a while you will hit the batter with a purpose pitch and you shouldn’t be throwing at someone’s head but the batter can’t just sit in a rocking chair especially when they get hot like Murphy is.

      • Section 222 - Oct 27, 2015 at 6:13 PM

        jd, I get that. But if you miss a little too close to the plate, you could get burned. And really, the way he’s hitting do you think that a few purpose pitches are going to cool him off? Anyway, I’m sure he’ll be happy to take some walks, and maybe that’s the best approach at this point.

      • natsfan1a - Oct 27, 2015 at 7:36 PM

        Severe jammage, even.

  8. Candide - Oct 27, 2015 at 6:29 PM

    Read something the other day that the Mets pitchers throw more fastballs than any other team in MLB.

    And the team that hits fastballs better than anyone? The Royals.





As ESPN-980 AM's Nats Insider, Mark makes daily appearances on the station's various shows. Here's the 2015 schedule (subject to change)...

MON: 12:45 p.m.
TUE: 2:30 p.m.
WED: 4:30 p.m.
THU: 2:30 p.m.
FRI: 5:30 p.m.
SAT: 10:30 a.m.

*All times Eastern. You can also listen to the station on 94.3 FM, 92.7 FM and online at Click here for past audio clips.

Follow us on Twitter