Skip to content

Harper sets Nats walks record

Sep 23, 2015, 10:00 AM EDT

USA Today

At the rate he is going, an MVP favorite at the age of 22, Bryce Harper is probably going to set a lot of records before his career is over.

He will likely break a bunch of Nationals team records, as they only have 11 seasons to pull from. Then, he will set his sights on franchise marks which include Expos greats such as Vladimir Guerrero, Andre Dawson and Tim Raines. And after that, perhaps some all-time MLB records, as well. After all, the guy is already doing things at his age that few in the long history of baseball have ever accomplished.

On Tuesday, Harper set a record that could be the first of many. He is now the sole owner of the Nationals single season walks record, previously held by Adam Dunn who walked 116 times in 2009. That was coincidentally the year the Nats finished in last place and earned the good fortune of taking Harper No. 1 overall the following summer.

Harper actually walked three times on Tuesday. His first inning walk tied the record and his fifth inning walk broke it. Then, for good measure, he walked again in the eighth inning. It was the eighth time in 143 games this season he has walked three times or more. He has drawn at least two walks in 24 games this year.

This particular performance came in a loss to the Orioles, another tough defeat in what will likely end up being a lost season for his team. Those usually aren’t the best times to get a player to speak about their individual accomplishments, and Harper explained his walks in terms of continuing to fight for his team’s playoff life.

“I’m just trying to have good at-bats. Just trying to get on base. I have faith in the guys behind me to get it done. If I can just get on base and hopefully score runs, then we’re winning ballgames. I’m just trying to keep the faith, keep going and keep trying to just get on base for my guys. Just trying to score as many runs as I can,” he said.

Manager Matt Williams has been asked countless times this season about the maturation of Harper, how it has been for a teacher to watch his pupil take such a significant leap in his development. Williams, who generally likes to stay within moments and take matters day-by-day, decided to take a step back and appreciate what Harper has done this year and what he could be capable of moving forward.

“It just means that he’s had a great year. It means that he’s staying with his plan. It means that he continues to be patient at the plate,” Williams said. “It just means that he’s continuing with his progress and that’s a very good sign for this franchise for years to come.”

Drawing 118 walks – and counting – in a season is a rare feat that few MLB players will ever accomplish. He currently ranks second in baseball behind only Joey Votto, who is perhaps more associated with the stat than any contemporary player.

Harper’s ability to draw walks has impressed just about everyone this season, including teammate Jose Lobaton.

“He’s one of the greatest hitters I’ve ever seen. It’s unbelievable to see how many walks he can take in a year,” he said.

The Nationals have 12 games remaining on their schedule and Harper does not appear to be slowing down. There are a few more records he could set before it is all said and done.

He is five walks away from tying Ken Singleton’s franchise single season record of 123. At 41 homers, Harper is just five away from Alfonso Soriano’s record of 46 set in 2006. He is almost guaranteed to have the best on-base percentage (Mike Jorgensen, .444 in 1974), slugging percentage (Guerrero, .664 in 2000) and OPS (Guerrero, 1.074 in 2000) in franchise history. And he’s just behind Guerrero’s franchise-best .345 average with a .342 clip after Tuesday.

Those numbers should fall in due time and then Harper will aim for the next ones as he continues to ascend as an MLB superstar. With the way he is playing these days, no record is truly safe.

  1. Whack-A-Mule - Sep 23, 2015 at 11:08 AM

    Please, Chase:
    Cut out all the “franchise” crap.
    Vladimir Guerrero, Andre Dawson, Tim Raines, Gary Carter, whatever.
    These players have nothing to do with Bryce Harper, the Nats, Washington or you and me.

    What happened in Montreal stays in Montreal.

    What we have is WASHINGTON baseball, not some “franchise” temporarily there, now here, next where?

    Washington, D.C. was (and is) one of the original 10 MLB cities in the “Modern Era” (i.e. post-1903 and the
    affiliation of the National and American Leagues) >

    Compare Bryce Harper to Goose Goslin, Joe Judge, Bucky Harris, Joe Cronin or even Ozzie Bluege,
    Washington Nats players all.

    “Franchise” and Franchise History” are nonsense and drivel; merely an artificial concept promoted
    only by the MLB marketing people.

    • jfmii - Sep 23, 2015 at 12:17 PM

      I disagree. The Nationals are a continuation of the Expos franchise. They are not an expansion team like the second Senators group.

      And to me it makes no sense to compare them to the original Senators. That history now belongs to the Minnesota Twins

    • mythicalmonkey - Sep 23, 2015 at 1:01 PM

      I’m with Whack-a-Mule — I didn’t retroactively become an Expos fan just because the Nats came from Montreal. But I did sit in the Frank Howard seat in old RFK and I’ve known the history of Walter Johnson and Goose Goslin, and for that matter, Josh Gibson and Buck Leonard, for years and years. That’s Washington baseball. That’s the context I’m looking for.

  2. trfwans - Sep 23, 2015 at 11:32 AM

    Tough loss by the Expos franchise to the Browns franchise last night, eh Chase?

    Come to think of it, both Baltimore’s baseball and football franchises used to be the Browns, yet their media never mentions that fact. The Washington media should follow their example.

    • jfmii - Sep 23, 2015 at 12:20 PM

      Ian Desmond was drafted by the Expos. The history and connection of this Nationals team with the Expos is relevant.

      • Section 222 - Sep 23, 2015 at 1:59 PM

        For a few more months?

    • mythicalmonkey - Sep 23, 2015 at 1:10 PM

      Yeah, if the Baltimore Orioles ever once talked about Brooks Robinson in the context of Harlond Clift, I’ll eat Camden Yards.

      Or possibly eat a crab cake at Camden Yards, which given my distaste for Peter Angelos specifically and American League baseball generally, is about as likely.

      • nats106 - Sep 23, 2015 at 1:40 PM

        Harlond Clift? Why I haven’t heard that name since Eddie Gaedel.

        And yes, my distaste for Angelos is so great that I refuse to go the Orioles games even when they are the guest.

  3. Eugene in Oregon - Sep 23, 2015 at 1:36 PM

    I don’t believe this is Chase Hughes’ decision. I’m pretty sure this how MLB tracks franchises.

  4. Whack-A-Mule - Sep 23, 2015 at 2:00 PM

    Just because the MLB promulgates these “franchise” fictions,
    journalists (such as Chase and Mark) are under no obligation
    to write about same.

    The Minnesota Twins have no past, no history, prior to 1961.
    The Montreal Expos have no future, have no present, beyond 2004.
    Ne exist pas.
    Washington baseball is, has been, and will be internally coherent and eternal.

    • trfwans - Sep 23, 2015 at 3:06 PM

      I think the key to the “franchise” thing is whether the team keeps the name after moving. Dodgers, Giants, Braves and A’s have kept those names despite their moves to new cities. Browns, Senators 1 and 2, Seattle Pilots and Expos did not. If that results in “orphan” franchises, so be it.





As ESPN-980 AM's Nats Insider, Mark makes daily appearances on the station's various shows. Here's the 2015 schedule (subject to change)...

MON: 12:45 p.m.
TUE: 2:30 p.m.
WED: 4:30 p.m.
THU: 2:30 p.m.
FRI: 5:30 p.m.
SAT: 10:30 a.m.

*All times Eastern. You can also listen to the station on 94.3 FM, 92.7 FM and online at Click here for past audio clips.

Follow us on Twitter